This experimental protocol describes and optimizes a multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining method, mainly by optimizing single-channel antibody incubation conditions and adjusting the settings of antibodies and channels to solve the problems of autofluorescence and channel crosstalk in lung cancer tissues of clinical origin.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of malignant tumor-related morbidity and mortality all over the world, and the complex tumor microenvironment has been considered the leading cause of death in lung cancer patients. The complexity of the tumor microenvironment requires effective methods to understand cell-to-cell relationships in tumor tissues. The multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) technique has become a key tool for inferring the relationship between the expression of proteins upstream and downstream of signaling pathways in tumor tissues and developing clinical diagnoses and treatment plans. mIHC is a multi-label immunofluorescence staining method based on Tyramine Signal Amplification (TSA) technology, which can simultaneously detect multiple target molecules on the same tissue section sample to achieve different protein co-expression and co-localization analysis. In this experimental protocol, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of lung squamous carcinoma of clinical origin were subjected to multiplex immunohistochemical staining. By optimizing the experimental protocol, multiplex immunohistochemical staining of labeled target cells and proteins was achieved, solving the problem of autofluorescence and channel crosstalk in lung tissues. In addition, multiplex immunohistochemical staining is widely used in the experimental validation of tumor-related, high-throughput sequencing, including single-cell sequencing, proteomics, and tissue space sequencing, providing intuitive and visual pathology validation results.
Tyramine signal amplification (TSA), which has a history of more than 20 years, is a class of assay techniques that use horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for high-density in situ labeling of target antigens and is widely applied in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and other techniques for the detection of biological antigens, substantially improving the sensitivity of the detected signal1. Opal polychromatic staining based on TSA technology has been recently developed and widely used in several studies2,3,4,5. Traditional immunofluorescence (IF) staining provides researchers with an easy tool for the detection and comparison of the distribution of proteins in the cells and tissues of various model organisms. It is based on antibody-/antigen-specific binding and includes direct and indirect approaches6. Direct immunostaining involves the use of a fluorophore-conjugated primary antibody against the antigen of interest, which enables direct fluorescent detection using a fluorescence microscope. The indirect immunostaining approach involves the application of a fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody against the unconjugated primary antibody6,7.
Traditional, single-label, immunofluorescence staining methods can stain only one, two, or in some cases, three antigens in tissues, which is a major limitation in mining the rich information contained in tissue sections. The interpretation of quantitative results often depends on visual observation and accurate quantification by imaging software, such as ImageJ. There are technical limitations, such as antibody species restriction, weak fluorescent label signals, and fluorescent dye color overlap (Table 1). The Opal multiplex IHC (mIHC) technique is based on TSA derivation, which allows multiplex staining and differential labeling of more than 7-9 antigens on the same tissue section, with no restriction on the origin of the primary antibody, but requires high specificity of the corresponding antibody against the antigen. The staining procedure is similar to that of normal immunofluorescence staining, except for two differences: each round of staining involves the use of only one antibody and an antibody elution step is added. Antibodies bound to the antigen by noncovalent bonds can be removed by microwave elution, but the TSA fluorescent signal bound to the surface of the antigen by covalent bonds is retained.
Activated tyramine (T) molecules labeled with the dye are highly enriched at the target antigen, allowing efficient amplification of the fluorescent signal. This allows direct labeling of the antigen without antibody interference, and then multicolor labeling can be achieved after multiple staining cycles8,9,10 (Figure 1). Although this technology produces reliable and accurate images for the study of disease, the creation of a useful multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) staining strategy can be time-consuming and exacting due to the need for extensive optimization and design. Therefore, this multiplex panel protocol has been optimized in an automated IHC stainer with a shorter staining time than that of the manual protocol. This approach can be directly applied and adapted by any researcher for immuno-oncology studies on human formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples11. Moreover, the methods for slide preparation, antibody optimization, and multiplex design will be helpful in obtaining robust images that represent accurate cellular interactions in situ and to shorten the optimization period for manual analysis12.
The mfIHC mainly includes image acquisition and data analysis. In terms of image acquisition, multicolor-labeled complex-stained samples need to be detected with professional spectral imaging equipment to identify the various mixed color signals and obtain high signal-to-noise images without interference from tissue autofluorescence. Current equipment for spectral imaging mainly includes spectral confocal microscopes and multispectral tissue imaging systems. The multispectral tissue imaging system is a professional imaging system designed for the quantitative analysis of tissue sections, and its most important feature is the acquisition of image spectral information, which provides both morphological structure and optical mapping information of biological tissue samples13,14. Any pixel in the spectral image contains a complete spectral curve, and each dye (including autofluorescence) has its corresponding characteristic spectrum, which enables the complete recording and accurate identification of mixed and overlapping multilabel signals.
In terms of data analysis, multicolor-labeled samples are extremely complex due to the morphological structure and constituent cells of the tissue samples. Ordinary software cannot automatically identify different tissue types. Hence, intelligent quantitative tissue analysis software is used for quantitative analysis of antigen expression in specific regions15,16,17,18.
Above all, multilabel immunofluorescence staining fused with multispectral imaging and quantitative pathology analysis technology has the advantages of a large number of detection targets, effective staining, and accurate analysis, and it can therefore significantly improve the accuracy of histomorphological analysis, reveal the spatial relationship between proteins with cellular-level resolution, and help to mine richer and more reliable information from tissue section samples19 (Table 1).
mIHC is an indispensable experimental technique in the field of scientific research for the quantitative and spatial analysis of multiple protein markers at the single-cell level in a single tissue section, providing intuitive and accurate data for the study of disease pathology by focusing on the detailed tissue structure and cellular interactions in the context of the original tissue. The widespread adoption of mIHC technology will require optimized and effective experimental protocols. To address the problems that may…
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to acknowledge members of the Clinical Pathology Research Institute West China Hospital, who contributed technical guidance for quality multiplex immunofluorescence and IHC processing. This protocol was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200078).
Reagents | |||
Anti-CD8 | Abcam | ab237709 | Primary antibody, 1/100, PH9 |
Anti-CD68 | Abcam | ab955 | Primary antibody, 1/300, PH9 |
Anti-CK5/6 | Millipore | MAB1620 | Primary antibody, 1/150, PH9 |
Anti-HMGCS1 | GeneTex | GTX112346 | Primary antibody, 1/300, PH6 |
Animal nonimmune serum | MXB Biotechnologies | SP KIT-B3 | Antigen blocking |
Fluormount-G | SouthernBiotech | 0100-01 | Anti-fluorescent burst |
Opal PolarisTM 7-Color Manual IHC Kit | Akoya | NEL861001KT | Opal mIHC Staining |
Wash Buffer | Dako | K8000/K8002/K8007/K8023 | Washing the tissues slides |
Software | |||
HALO | intelligent quantitative tissue analysis software, paid software | ||
inForm | intelligent quantitative tissue analysis software, paid software | ||
PerkinElmer Vectra | multispectral tissue imaging systems, fully automatic scanning of tissue slides. | ||
QuPath 0.3.2 | intelligent quantitative tissue analysis software, open source software, used in this experiment. |