Summary

Grade III Varicocele Surgical Treatment using Spermatic Vein-Superficial Abdominal Vein Shunt

Published: August 23, 2024
doi:

Summary

Here, we present a protocol for grade III varicocele surgical treatment that aims to rebuild the venous drainage of the spermatic cord by a spermatic vein-superficial abdominal vein shunt performed under the microscope.

Abstract

Microsurgical varicocelectomy is the most commonly used method for the treatment of varicocele (VC) in recent years. However, it is technically demanding with the risk of damaging the normal anatomical structure of the spermatic cord, such as the cremaster muscle, testicular artery, and vas deferens during the pampiniform plexus ligation. Also, traditional varicocelectomy hinders the drainage of the stagnant venous blood of the affected testicle, resulting in a persistent scrotal appearance of varicose veins and slower remission of swelling sensation in postoperative patients with grade III VC. Therefore, we developed a retroperitoneal varicocelectomy with a microscopical spermatic venous-superficial vein of the abdominal wall bypass procedure. The spermatic vein was transected and ligated proximally through the retroperitoneal space. Then, the distal spermatic vein was freed and passed through the internal ring; under the skin of the groin, a microscopic vascular anastomosis was performed to build the bypass of the distal spermatic vein and proximal inferior epigastric vein. The high ligation facilitates the protection of the normal anatomy of the spermatic cord, and the venous bypass allows rapid testicular blood drainage, which can effectively improve the degree of varicocele, testicular pain, and even spermatogenic function. In conclusion, the present protocol describes a promising way to reconstruct the spermatic return through high retroperitoneal ligation of the spermatic vein and anastomosis of the spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein, which resulted in faster and more obvious improvement in symptoms and better prognosis of grade III VC.

Introduction

The incidence of varicocele (VC) in adult males is 11.7%, and in males with abnormal semen quality, the incidence is up to 25.4%1. Clinical manifestations include symptoms of ipsilateral testicular growth and developmental disorders accompanied by pain, discomfort, low fertility, and hypogonadism. Clinical specialist examinations can detect and grade varicocele2. VC III grade shows positive for clinical palpation and ultrasonic varicocele inner diameter ≥ 3.1 mm and reflux time ≥ 6 s, often accompanied by more severe testicular pain or swelling discomfort3,4.

Recent studies have shown that VC microsurgical varicocelectomy is considered to be the most effective way of VC repair due to its advantages of fewer complications and low recurrence rate5,6,7. However, this procedure has some shortcomings: as in the past, scrotal, inguinal, or subinguinal incisions are often used, which easily damage the cremaster muscle, testicular artery, vas deferens artery and lymphatic vessels. Especially in grade III VC, it is more likely to be accidentally injured due to the many branches of the pampiniform plexus, and damage to the normal anatomical structure of the spermatic cord will cause postoperative complications such as testicular pain, swelling, and atrophy8. Additionally, traditional varicocelectomy by simple ligation of the spermatic vein hinders the drainage of the stagnant venous blood of the affected testicle, resulting in a persistent scrotal appearance of varicose veins and slower remission of swelling sensation in postoperative patients with grade III VC and the relief of testicular pain or swelling discomfort is slow or not obvious, with poor efficacy9. It is conducive to restoring the physiological hemodynamics of the testes by varicocele repair rather than simple varicocelectomy10. For example, microscopic internal spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis has also been reported to be applied to the treatment of varicocele11. Here, we describe a protocol for grade III varicocele surgical treatment that aims to ligate spermatic veins at the high retroperitoneal level and rebuild the venous drainage of the spermatic cord by a spermatic vein-superficial abdominal vein (also known as superficial epigastrin vein or vena epigastrica superficialis) shunt under the microscope.

For this study, a retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 96 patients in the hospital from June 2018 to August 2021 who had grade III VC and complained of testicular pain or distension discomfort, who had received spermatic vein ligation, and who had complete follow-up data. The pain score was assessed by visual scoring (VAS). They were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: study group A was treated with high ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope and transfer of spermatic venue-superficial abdominal vein (49 cases), and study group B was treated with low ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope (47 cases).

Protocol

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (NO. 2020-478), prior to the start of the clinical study. All subjects provided informed consent before the study. The inclusion criteria for cases are (1) grade III varicocele confirmed by clinical palpation and ultrasonic examination of varicocele inner diameter ≥ 3.1 mm and reflux time ≥ 6 s; (2) Combined scrotal pain and discomfort; (3) Completed surgical treatment for varicocele in the hospital. Exclu…

Representative Results

For this study, the 96 patients were divided into two groups: study group A, treated with high ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope and transfer of spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein (49 cases), and study group B, treated with low ligation9,12,13,14,15 of the spermatic vein under a microscope (47 cases). The basic data, operation time, hospit…

Discussion

Increasing evidence has shown that microsurgical varicocelectomy has more advantages than open or laparoscopic varicocelectomy for the surgical management of VC5,6. The surgical microscope can magnify the anatomical details with a clear field of vision, and the arteriovenous, lymphatic vessels and nerves can be discerned more readily. In contrast, it is difficult to distinguish the arteries and veins clearly in other surgical procedures. They may miss venous vess…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Guangdong Science and Technology Plan project, funded by the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (grant number: 2021A1515410004); Development Research Center of Medicine and Health Science and Technology, National Health Commission (grant number: HDSL202001007).

Materials

Clexan (Enoxaparin Sodium Injection) Sanofi (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Co., LTD
CROWNJUN (Nylon suture) Kono Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Japan
Doppler ultrasonography Mindray, Shenzhen, China Resona R9
Microscope Zeiss, Jena, Germany OPMI PENTERO 800
Non-absorbable suture Johnson, (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., LTD
Rivaroxaban Bayer Healthcare GMBH
VICRYL (absorbable surgical suture) Johnson, (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., LTD

References

  1. World Health Organization. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril. 57 (6), 1289-1293 (1992).
  2. Goldstein, M. . Surgical management of male infertility. , 648-687 (2012).
  3. Punjani, N., Wald, G., Gaffney, C. D., Goldstein, M., Kashanian, J. A. Predictors of varicocele-associated pain and its impact on semen parameters following microsurgical repair. Andrologia. 53 (8), e14121 (2021).
  4. Jellad, S., et al. Sperm DNA status in infertile patients with clinical varicocele. Prog Urol. 31 (2), 105-111 (2021).
  5. Jensen, C., et al. Varicocele and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 14 (9), 523-533 (2017).
  6. Ding, H., et al. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int. 110 (10), 1536-1542 (2012).
  7. Mehta, A., Goldstein, M. Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review. Asian J Androl. 15 (1), 56-60 (2013).
  8. Tatem, A. J., Brannigan, R. E. The role of microsurgical varicocelectomy in treating male infertility. Transl Androl Urol. 6 (4), 722-729 (2017).
  9. Kim, S. O., Jung, H., Park, K. Outcomes of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles. J Androl. 33 (5), 872-875 (2012).
  10. Pagani, R. L., Ohlander, S. J., Niederberger, C. S. Microsurgical varicocele ligation: surgical methodology and associated outcomes. Fertil Steril. 111 (3), 415-419 (2019).
  11. Wang, L., Yang, Q., Xie, X., Dou, K. Microscopic internal spermatic vein- inferior epigastric vein anastomosis in the treatment of left varicocele: A review and case report. Asian J Surg. 46 (9), 3963-3964 (2023).
  12. Salehzadeh, M., et al. Evaluation of the role of reflux pattern in Color Doppler Ultrasound on spermogram improvement after varicocelectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 52 (12), 2245-2251 (2020).
  13. Wan, X., Wang, H., Ji, Z. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for clinical varicocele: A review for potential new indications. Andrologia. 49 (10), (2017).
  14. Lv, K. L., et al. Varicocele anatomy during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese men. Andrologia. 47 (10), 1190-1195 (2015).
  15. Hopps, C. V., Lemer, M. L., Schlegel, P. N., Goldstein, M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 170 (6 Pt 1), 2366-2370 (2003).
  16. Mashour, G. A., Woodrum, D. T., Avidan, M. S. Neurological complications of surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 114 (2), 194-203 (2015).

Tags

This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Cite This Article
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Chunhua, D. Grade III Varicocele Surgical Treatment using Spermatic Vein-Superficial Abdominal Vein Shunt. J. Vis. Exp. (210), e65048, doi:10.3791/65048 (2024).

View Video